History, Historical Fiction, and I’m a Dork

Since starting this blog, I’ve altered my reading habits somewhat. I’ve always been a one-book-at-a-time kind of girl — I just can’t do the being in the middle of lots of books at once — but I’m now usually switching back and forth between whatever adult book I’m reading (mostly on the subway) and kids books (mostly at home evenings and weekends).  And since for adult books I mostly read history, I’ve been thinking a lot about why I read so little history as a kid.

My thoughts go something like this:

I love reading history, particularly histories with a radical or left-wing bent. And its because a well-written history about something I care about that happened is, first and foremost, an exciting and engaging story. Even if I know the outcome more or less, there are truly inspiring characters, people I can relate to, situations that may be set in a different  time and place but that resonate with my own experiences.  There are exciting plot lines with frustrating moments, upsetting moments, triumphant moments.* In short, a lot of the same elements that make for a good fiction story.

Now, what’s odd to me is that I read very little history as a kid or teenager. I did read a lot of those blue biographies of famous people’s childhoods.** And I liked the “If you were alive in the time of…” books, which apparently are still around with updated covers, and I should check them out. But mostly I read tons and tons of historical fiction. The interest in history was there – I always loved social studies and history in school, I was always interested in and inspired by what I knew of the history of the labor movement,*** women’s movement, and abolitionist & civil rights movements. Part of what I liked so much about historical fiction was learning the history. I think if they had crossed my path, I would have been interested in good non-fiction histories of those movements and periods of time. I also had a very deep interest in the holocaust, read tons of historical fiction on it, but very little straight history that I can recall until I was maybe 15.

So I guess what I’m wondering is, why didn’t I read more history as a kid? Were there just not a lot of good, engaging history books out there? Did I just not come across them? Or I guess because my only experiences of reading history at that point were from school textbooks, I might have thought of history books as boring, even as I felt the subject matter was interesting and enjoyed learning about it.

I’ve read a lot of good things about WE ARE THE SHIP, which I haven’t gotten a chance to read yet. Are there other good non-fiction books that folks have come across lately, or remember from childhood?

*I get such strange looks on the subway sometimes because I’m reading what must look like a big boring history book and I’m grinning and almost jumping out of my seat in excitement because something so awesome just happened. Like, I just read a great history of Solidarity in Soviet Poland, and when all the workers were heading to their factories with food and sleeping bags to lock them selves in I just couldn’t contain my enthusiasm. (Yes, I am a huge dork.)

**I was talking about these with my dad the other day and he noted that this series idealized historical figures to the point of becoming fiction. Somehow I didn’t note that at the time, which is surprising since the history I got in elementary school was relatively non-idealized. (For example, in fourth grade my class put Columbus on trial for crimes against the Native Americans. I got to be the judge, which was super exciting, and when the jury found Columbus guilty I got to name the sentance and I gave him an infinity of homework.) 

***Which I first learned about from old folk songs. Picture a 4 year old skipping around the house, singing along to The Weavers’ Talking Union, and pausing to ask, “Daddy, what’s a scab?”

11 Responses to “History, Historical Fiction, and I’m a Dork”

  1. Sadako Says:

    Oh, I love switching between heavier and lighter (kids, or BSC books and the like) fare. It’s fun.

    I don’t know why I didn’t like nonfiction when I was younger but now I really love it. Maybe b/c when you’re learning stuff for school it feels like so much work so you just want to read about pirates and babysitters and twins and people turning out to be dogs?

  2. Lenore Says:

    I’ve always added non-fiction, and especially history, into my reading mix. I like to learn things!

  3. Elizabeth Says:

    I’m not sure how much of it is what kids gravitate towards “naturally” (as though there is such a thing) and how much is what they get exposed to, and how.

    I’ve read articles arguing that most people become, e.g., children’s librarians because they love fiction, and some librarians and teachers assume that non-fiction is something boring you read for information only, and impart that message to kids. Some of these articles argue that boys read more than is acknowledged, they just don’t read what girls read, and the kinds of non-fiction they read aren’t taken seriously by adults.

    I have no expertise and very little relevant experience here, so I’d be interested to hear from more of our readers, including our librarians or librarians-in-training.

  4. Gretchen Says:

    I recall as a young adult (18 yrs old) taking a course in African American Women’s History. I really struggled with some of the books, and loved others. There was a clear distinction: The books I loved were all written in the first person. The autobiographies of Ida B. Wells and Anne Moody are the two I remember most clearly. I needed to experience the history through someone. It gave me a way to relate to what was happening, to feel it personally even though I wasn’t there. I loved those books and learned so much from them. The books that tried to pack in tons of information in a more traditional history format? I rarely stayed awake long enough to finish them, and when I did I could never recall any of it.
    I don’t know if the same holds true for younger kids, but it made sense to me personally that history had to be meaningful in order for me to find it engaging. Those first-person accounts brought history to life.

  5. Elizabeth Says:

    Gretchen: I’ve been trying to figure out what to read next, and you’re inspiring me to want to pick up REBEL GIRLS, the autobiography of Elizabeth Gurley Flynn (early U.S. socialist/communist/labor leader), again. I got about halfway through in the winter, loved it, put it down when the semester started, and regret not finishing it. It was a really fun read.

  6. Emily Says:

    Gretchen, you bring up an interesting point, in that the history I did read as a kid was mainly biographies rather than other forms of history, whereas I now read very few biographies. What you say about getting in via a person and their experience totally makes sense, and I think that’s also what makes good historical fiction work so well – you get to experience it through a character that’s relatable and through whom you can imagine yourself in a historical time and place.

    I guess part of what’s changed from my interests and thus reading selections from childhood to now is that I’ve developed a very deep interest in social movements and in the dynamics of how movements and organizations work, which is why I love reading not just about historical figures or events, but histories that detail how things happened. I didn’t have that specific interest so much when I was younger, it really came from my experiences as an activist over the past 7-8 years.

  7. jess Says:

    I was a huge historical fiction reader as a child (okay, I still am) but I don’t remember reading many non-fiction titles. I devoured Johnny Tremain, but I had to renew a biography of George Washington twenty times before I got halfway through it. I did read bios of people I thought were more interesting – writers and dancers, mostly. I’m not sure how much was lack of interest (or feeling satisfied with historical fiction) and how much was the quality of the titles I ran across. As an adult, I’ve fallen in love with children’s non-fiction – historical and otherwise – since it seems to distill what’s really important into a manageable package, while adult authors go on tangents or more in-depth than I care for.

    I’m a huge fan of Jim Murphy’s titles, Russell Freedman’s good, We Are the Ship was awesome…I’ve also liked a lot of the Sibert Medal winners.

  8. Dave McGowan Says:

    I’ve always liked history but only because I’ve used my imagination when reading it. The stuff we were fed in school was, by itself, a bore.We were forced to concentrate on dates so that we could be tested on it later and in order to keep us from becoming confussed the events were seldom linked to coenciding events.
    However, if you use a little imagination along with these bare bones facts one can build a real story.
    That’s why I have always enjoyed … and enjoy writing … historical fiction.
    Dave
    http://www.dmmcgowan.blogspot.com

  9. Kelly Says:

    Totally agree with Dave. Hated history in school, love historical fiction and nonfiction now.

    Check out a book called Lies My Teacher Told Me. It articulated for me a lot of reasons why I hated history class growing up.

  10. Janssen Says:

    I just recently read “Escape!” about Harry Houdini by Sid Fleischman and it was terrific! Of course, I was a history major, so I always love those nerdy things :)

  11. Elizabeth Says:

    Oh, that sounds kind of awesome. I was pretty into Houdini when I was little, which was largely influenced by the movie The Linguini Incident.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: