Wednesday Words: From now on, I’m just going to describe my house as “truthy.”

A lie was so tidy, like a small box you could make with nails and thin pieces of wood and glue. But the truth lay sprawled all over the place like the mess up in the attic.

– Paula Fox, ONE-EYED CAT

Besides liking this metaphor because it captures something I recognize*, I like this because it’s the opposite of that “Oh, what a tangled web we weave…” adage, which I first learned from a CHARLES IN CHARGE episode built around it. When I stop to think about it, it is astounding and horrifying how much of my basic cultural education comes from terrible ’80s sitcoms.

* And am I the only one who sometimes tells small, irrelevant lies, especially to strangers, for exactly this reason? Except then they sometimes spiral out of control and suddenly your tidy little box that you only constructed in the first place to avoid making small talk more complicated than interests either party is like a faulty Jack-in-the-Box of conversational pitfalls that could leap out at any moment and this is what I was saying about not being able to construct metaphors.

My debut novel is about a drug-addicted dog-lover… or maybe the canine is the one with the chemical dependency problem?

Thanks to 100 Scope Notes for starting up this game.

It appears that my YA debut novel carries the timeless message that if you’re spending your afternoons in the garage with a bag full of magic markers, your dog will know.

YAbookcover

Original image here. Also, it appears that the real Christina C. Treiber is a librarian’s assistant. I hope she likes Ellen Hopkins novels.

And now I am going to brag.

Publisher’s Weekly on IRAQIGIRL:
IraqiGirl_cover final.2

IraqiGirl: Diary of a Teenage Girl in Iraq. Haymarket (Consortium, dist.), $13 paper ISBN 978-1-931859-73-8

In 2004 in Mosul (the third largest city in Iraq), a 15-year-old girl started a blog detailing her life in the midst of the Iraq War. Her journal encompasses the day-to-day trauma the American invasion has caused her city, her family and friends. “Today is like every day in Iraq. No electricity, no fun, and no peace,” writes Hadiya (all Iraqi names in the book are pseudonyms). Her struggle against helplessness is agonizing, though her view modulates somewhat over time (her blog is still active, but the book covers her writings only through 2007). “I sense that my country is still beautiful in spite of everything that has happened to it,” she says during a hopeful moment. Poems and photographs accompany her thoughts on her academic struggles, Islam and growing up in a war zone; comments from her blog are interspersed, and Hadiya responds to others in several entries (“Another anonymous said, ‘You certainly don’t deserve this life.’ I want to ask you something—is this really a life?”). Hadiya’s authentically teenage voice, emotional struggles and concerns make her story all the more resonant. Ages 12–up. (July)

If you happen to be in the San Francisco area this week, please consider heading to Modern Times independent bookstore this Thursday, July 30, at 7 PM. IRAQIGIRL’s developer (i.e., the guy who discovered the IraqiGirl blog, had the idea to make it into a book, and assembled the initial manuscript), and former human shield in Baghdad, John Ross, will be talking about how the book came to be and reading some selections.

And now having shamelessly promoted the book, I’m going to even more shamelessly brag on behalf of the press publishing it. Here’s Library Journal, post-BEA:

Small presses, big books

Essays by Arundhati Roy and Wallace Shawn, plus reflections on the contemporary world by Noam Chomsky and Breyten Breytenbach. Top picks from a big New York house, right? Wrong. These authors are all being published this fall by Chicago-based Haymarket Press, truly a small press that thinks big and my top find of the convention. Roy’s Field Notes on Democracy: Listening to Grasshoppers (Sept.) argues that Hindu nationalism and economic reform are thwarting India’s democratic efforts, turning the country into a police state. Shawn’s Essays (Sept.), his first collection and ranging over his entire career, move from the act of playwriting to considerations of privilege, while Breytenbach’s Notes from the Middle World (Nov.) considers the artist’s role in a shrinking global environment. Chomsky’s Hopes and Prospects ponders political activism in the Western Hemisphere.

And now I am going to stop bragging. For this week, anyway! Real posts coming up.

A kids’-eye view of the kids sent to Iraq

Sunrise-Over-Fallujah_Walter-Dean-MyersOne of the reasons Madison’s public library wants me dead is my reluctance to read Walter Dean Myers’s SUNRISE OVER FALLUJAH. I returned this to the library, overdue, twice without having read it, before finally getting myself to crack it open (at a point when the creditors’ letters bemoaning my idea that this time, I’m really going to read this! were piling up).

Why the reluctance? I love Myers — I have since some kind soul got me to read MONSTER — and I was excited to know SUNRISE OVER FALLUJAH was coming out. I think the source of my Hotel Rwanda-ing of it is mostly that I read about, and think about, and talk about Iraq all the time*, and the idea of doing it at bedtime, when I read kids’ books to relax, was a bit overwhelming.

Of course, I’ve also been working on IRAQIGIRL this past year, putting “children’s/YA books about the Iraq war” a little more firmly into the camp of “work” rather than “chilling out with a sauvignon blanc and a book and pretending there’s not some journal article that some more virtuous grad student somewhere is taking notes on (or writing) while I enjoy this shit.”

Anyway, I was really glad when I finally did force myself to start SUNRISE, because it is excellent. All of Myers’s usual strengths come into play: he manages to genuinely individuate characters by the precise brand of sardonic wit they employ. This feat is one thing that elevates the book over generic war stories, with their military banter so tired we feel we’re on our own third deployment of it; I’ve, sadly, read my fair share of that, too, and Myers is better than it.

Another notable characteristic of SUNRISE is the serious research effort that Myers clearly put into it. Having read a lot of soldiers’ memoirs (nearly all more brutal and negative about the war than what Myers portrays, by the way, although his has certainly been received as a bleak view), SUNRISE broadly accords with what I’ve read and also heard soldiers describe; Myers also makes good use of facts that have more recently come to light — like Blackwater’s role in Iraq — to imagine what the war looked like back in its earliest days.

I particularly appreciated that some of this research was clearly off the beaten path of mainstream U.S. reporting, as when Myers’s protagonist, Robin “Birdy” Perry, witnesses an argument between his superior and a local sheikh:

“Do you really think that we have the problems your papers are reporting?” Hamid asked. “Do you think that people who have lived together more years than your country has been in existence suddenly find it impossible? That the hatred has grown so quickly between Sunnis and Shiites that we must shoot each other and bomb each other?”

The mythology of timeless and unchanging ethnic hatred in Iraq is so taken for granted in the U.S. that I was surprised and happy to see it explicitly challenged in one of the book’s key scenes. And it’s historically accurate: SUNRISE is set in the war’s first year, before the ethnic divisions among Iraqis had become so entrenched by the experience of occupation and by the electoral and military systems designed by the U.S.

That decision to set the story in the war’s early days is what gives Myers’s book its most effective emotional punch: the characters can truly believe that they’re about the find the fabled WMD, and we get to vicariously experience their ultimate betrayal without Myers having to take his story there directly. Here’s another such scene:

“Tell him we didn’t come to kill him,” I said. “That we’re trying to build a democracy over here.”

“You bombed my village,” the old man, his head down, replied slowly in English. “First you shoot into my house, then you come to the door.”

“Where you learn to speak English?” Jonesy asked.

“I drove a cab in London for twelve years,” answered the old man. “When I had enough money to buy a house for my family, I came back to my country.”

“You’re going to be all right,” Jonesy said. “We don’t hurt our prisoners.”

And, of course, everything we know about Abu Ghraib and everything else makes this scene intensely painful.

Which also raises my biggest question about the book. People who are about to be freshmen in college this fall were in sixth grade when the Iraq war began; they were in elementary school during 9/11. Myers’s target audience of high school students, of course, was even younger. Do they even remember the lies about the WMD? Do they remember Abu Ghraib? They never experienced, as news-aware citizens, the days when the most optimistic hopes of Myers’s characters were taken for granted by most Americans. What do they make of this book? And when Jonesy assures his prisoner, do they believe him?

* Emily and I both have a long history of involvement in the antiwar movement; we both, for example, were at different times members of the national coordinating committee of the Campus Antiwar Network, back when were were in college.

West Bend, Wisc. goes ’round the bend on censorship

Photo from http://www.flickr.com/photos/ender/517900257/

Now, if we were talking about the trauma inflicted by people talking too loudly on their cell phones on the bus, the "burning shit up" treatment might be one I'd be behind. Photo from http://www.flickr.com/photos/ender/517900257/

Thanks to blog reader (and off-blog friend, game-night hosting and chicken-raising extraordinaire) Kristy for pointing me to this article on a battle to remove “pornographic” (largely, LGBT-positive) books from the public library’s YA section.

Apparently learning from the U.S. corporate press’s working definition of “balance” (see Glenn Greenwald making this point on torture), the original couple calling for censorship is also claiming that the library needs to at least stock some materials by “ex-gays” in the YA section.

The efforts of the censors have now inspired a separate group of old men in Milwaukee to file a lawsuit calling for the books to be (what else?) burned. I mean, you have to feel sympathy for these guys, as evidently their “mental and emotional well-being” has been harmed by the books being stocked in a place where teenagers can find them. Insert your own joke about these dudes’ mental and emotional well-being here: ____________________.

Here’s me raising my glass to the West Bend librarians for standing their ground, and to West Bend citizen and mom Maria Hanahan, organizing the campaign against the censors. We can only hope that the publicity helps some of the books in question… much as I personally purchased GEOGRAPHY CLUB this morning in solidarity with its earlier censorship fight in one of my state’s libraries (and because I tend to trust Jennifer Hubbard‘s recommendations).

Wednesday Words: Signs of Impissing Doom

Honestly, in the governmental bureaucracy of Winter Park High School, Jasper Hanson was like Deputy Assistant Undersecretary of Athletics and Malfeasance. When a guy like that gets promoted to Executive Vice President of Urine Gunning, immediate action must be taken.

– John Green, PAPER TOWNS

I apologize for the post title, y’all. I have a math midterm tomorrow, is my excuse. Actually, I’m finding that math is a handy excuse for many things. When I’m caught behaving abnormally, I just wave my hand vaguely and say, “Math.” Most people are so horrified by the thought that I might elaborate that they leave it at that.

Children’s voices

I’m in the odd position of loving children without being very good with them. You know how there are those adults who really get how children think? I’m not one of them. But Beverly Cleary sure is.

(So is Emily, judging by her ability to articulate what she likes about SMASHED POTATOES. Plus, children always like Emily. I’m kind of like my dad: I tease kids in the one way I know how, and they either like it or they don’t, and if they don’t we’re both stuck.)

I was thinking about this lately because a few recent reads have had these little snatches of expressing something about childhood or adolescence. John Berger, observant as always, offers these small asides of descriptions in FROM A TO X, the adult novel I can’t stop talking about because I’m so proud I read one — like, “He already had a man’s voice but not the pace of a man’s voice.”

Or this one, which is now one of my favorite all-time descriptions of youth:

What the young know today they know more vividly and intensely and accurately than anyone else. They are experts of the parts they know.

There was a really good example in EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW ABOUT BEING A GIRL I LEARNED FROM JUDY BLUME, too. Berta Platas kind of mentions in passing an actual event from her own childhood:

I even sighed over Randy, the guy in homeroom who had a crush on me and gave me my first Valentine ever. I read it so many times that I can still recite the little Hallmark poem inside, and the signature, “Your friend forever which is Randall.” Sigh.*

Who could make up a Valentine like that? I mean, I guess a really good writer could. But I sure couldn’t. I love kids.

* (And yes, the inclusion of the “Sigh.” is an example of what I was saying about this book, about being startled by what strikes me as the sloppiness of the writing. It’s just kind of… all like that.)

Sunday Summary: it’s apparent that I require a higher level of social pressure than this series can provide…

…because even though I skipped last week, my Sunday Summary is really embarrassing. Meaning, I continue to start many books, and finish very, very few. I once had a professor who (twice!) sent me a long quote from Trotsky about how the problem with the young comrades is how they skipped from topic to topic instead of having the focus to really learn anything. That professor knew me better than people in positions of authority over me ought.

In my defense, my ongoing roommate search is taking way more time than I ever expected which kind of sucks, and also, I’ve been kind of obsessed with reading things related to my (new! improved!) MA thesis, which kind of really doesn’t suck at all, except it’s taken up my reading-for-fun-especially-about-teenagers-falling-in-and-out-of-love-with-each-other time. And come to think of it, the fact that I now read about unobserved heterogeneity distributions instead of cliques and monsters at bedtime may explain why I’ve been sleeping really poorly.

Anyway. Books finished and yes that is an inaccurate use of the plural:

  • FROM A TO X by John Berger. This is one of the best love stories I’ve read. It’s made me reconsider the fact that I never read adult fiction. There was really no way I wasn’t going to love this one, seeing as how it’s about love:

    I was clinging to you hard, not with my arms, because it was not your body I was clinging to, we were both sitting well back in our seats, very calm, I was clinging to your intentions, your exact intentions. What they were I couldn’t tell because I knew nothing about flying, but the way you intended whatever it was, was deeply familiar to me, and inseparable from my love for you.

    And war:

    What I admired about Fernando was his capacity to persuade people to be honest with themselves, for when this happens they gain the advantage of surprise. An incomparable tactical advantage in any insurrection. It’s the lies we tell ourselves that make us repetitive. Fernando understood this.

    And prisons. It’s about prisons.

Reading this week:

  • SEXUALITY AND SOCIALISM by Sherry Wolf. I put this down before finishing it when I was dealing with some other things, but I’m very excited to get back into it. Especially because the last few chapters are on the stuff I know less about. I particularly want to get more into her critique of the turn to queer theory in the academy.
  • I’ve been thinking about going on a mystery kick. Lenore‘s been reviewing some promising books I want to read, but I believe I’ll start with China Mieville’s new detective novel, CITY & CITY. It’s exceedingly rare that I shell out for a new hardcover, as I did with this one at a book fair last month (damn you for placing it by the register!), so I’ll feel lame if I don’t read it while it’s still new.
  • I’m also thinking about going on an LGBT young adult reading kick, because it’s been a while since I’ve read much of this lit (not in any large quantity since I was in high school, when there was a lot less of it). This was inspired by reading in the NY Times Book Review today about the promisingly-titled THE VAST FIELDS OF ORDINARY, which is so new that I’m going to try to get my hands on a free copy for review (in a political periodical), which means I won’t be reading it this week. So: LGBT teen/kid book suggestions welcome!
  • My boyfriend went to the American Library Association conference (he was exhibiting for Haymarket Books) and brought me back some freebies. They’re short enough that I can review them this week, so I’m keeping them a surprise…

IraqiGirl’s beautiful cover

IraqiGirl: Diary of a Teenage Girl in Iraq

Click for larger size. Or if you want to know why I’m posting this book’s cover, see here.

Wednesday Words: This is why I’m not a writer.

He has that careful way of walking which old men — but seldom old women — sometimes develop. As if they are carrying a full basin of water they don’t want to spill over. Come to think of it, it may be connected with prostate troubles.

– John Berger, FROM A TO X

John-Berger_FromAtoXSo I’m compounding Emily’s and my general delinquence of late when it comes to Wednesday Words by the fact that today’s comes from a book that in no way is intended for kids. But maybe I’ll compensate for it by saying something about the words.

‘Cause I’m still a little mystified by this book (which, no, I haven’t finished, and I’ll thank you to keep those kinds of questions to yourself), but one of the things I love about it is Berger (an art critic)’s little observations like that. Or this one:

Friends made in prison are different from others, aren’t they? They joke more. They bring an old joke out of their pocket, they take a bite and then they offer it around.

It’s the same reason I keep reading John Green even though at this point, the story lines about nerdy, awkward boys obsessed with mysterious girls who are primarily a vehicle for the boy’s discoveries about the world are getting a bit old. I keep reading Green because, despite myself (and to my continual surprise), I love the metaphors that seem like they spontaneously arise from the characters (but you know Green must have spent weeks creating). Because he’s a good writer.

This sociology professor I don’t know personally, but have long read the blog of, last year wrote an interactive fiction game that won a contest. In a post about it that I can’t find, I remember him saying that he couldn’t write a novel because, although he could write great scenes with snappy dialogue, he could never transition between them coherently, which he thought was what separated out real fiction writers. (Since I can’t find it, I hope I’m not butchering the point too badly.)

I think what separates me from fiction writers is a bit different. I’m pretty sure I could grow to be good at plotting, for example, because I think you can make it a largely intellectual exercise; I could learn to understand story structures deeply enough, I’m betting, that I could produce what seemed like emergent elements in them. (Which is what I think makes a good plot: when you’re startled by what happens but can immediately see how inevitable it was.) (Buffy Season Two, I am once again looking to you as the epitome of what a plot should be. Thank you for being a part of my life.)

But I don’t think I could learn to write like Berger, or Green. Part of it, I’m sure, isn’t about writing per se, as much as that I just don’t notice enough. Which maybe I could learn. But I feel that there’s also an irreducible creativity in creating these startling comparisons, which I simply lack.

This is also why lazy stock physical descriptions annoy me so much. I could come up with that much on my own; if I’m reading your book, I expect better. Like this. *

It’s possible that I only think I couldn’t learn this because I’ve never seen it well articulated enough. I’ve read a fair number of books on writing, but they’re rarely on writing at the line level, maybe because it’s hard to explain the principles of good writing on that level besides, you know, good grammar. I did once have an extended argument with a therapist about whether I could learn to be funny. I’m not quite sure why I feel convinced that I could learn to tell a great joke, but not to describe one like Berger does.

* And speaking of good writing, how much do I love the second-to-last paragraph of that link? Much.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.